Your Questions About obesity statistics

Richard asks…
How Do We Compare With Obesity Statistics in the rest of the world ~~~~~~>?
OECD nation’s date
Health Statistics > Obesity (most recent) by country
VIEW DATA: Totals
Definition Source Printable version
Bar Graph Map Correlations
Showing latest available data. Rank Countries Amount
# 1 United States: 30.6%
# 2 Mexico: 24.2%
# 3 United Kingdom: 23%
# 4 Slovakia: 22.4%
# 5 Greece: 21.9%
# 6 Australia: 21.7%
# 7 New Zealand: 20.9%
# 8 Hungary: 18.8%
# 9 Luxembourg: 18.4%
# 10 Czech Republic: 14.8%
# 11 Canada: 14.3%
# 12 Spain: 13.1%
# 13 Ireland: 13%
# 14 Germany: 12.9%
= 15 Portugal: 12.8%
= 15 Finland: 12.8%
# 17 Iceland: 12.4%
# 18 Turkey: 12%
# 19 Belgium: 11.7%
# 20 Netherlands: 10%
# 21 Sweden: 9.7%
# 22 Denmark: 9.5%
# 23 France: 9.4%
# 24 Austria: 9.1%
# 25 Italy: 8.5%
# 26 Norway: 8.3%
# 27 Switzerland: 7.7%
= 28 Japan: 3.2%
= 28 Korea, South: 3.2%
Why are obesity statistics highest in western countries?

admin answers:
In the west we eat more food than other countries because most of us have become addicted to carbohydrates. This causes us to suffer cravings and hunger pains even when we are full. Widespread carbohydrate addiction began to take root about forty years ago we changed our traditional diet from mainly protein to mainly carbohydrate. That’s when we began to diet and that’s when we began to get fat. Is it any wonder obesity statistics began to rise and are still rising now? In other parts of the world like Africa and Asia, people did not change their traditional diet and they did not get fat. That despite the fact that fast food outlets have managed to infiltrate many of those countries.

Sharon asks…
How do I find per capita obesity statistics?
I’m doing a statistics assignment for my math class, and my topic is Number of McDonalds by country vs. Obesity statistics (correlation).
I have the number of McDonalds for about 39 countries, but to be more accurate i need to do number of McDonalds per capita. Do I just divide the population by the number of McDonalds? or the opposite?Thanks, I appreciate it

admin answers:
You are trying to find out if a greater number of McDonalds creates a greater amount of obesity
Divide the number of McDonalds outlets into the number of obese people who make up the obesity statistics in each country…….this will give you the quickest ratio of number of McDonalds per numbers of fat people in each country. You can then compare the ratio between each country who has verifiable obesity statistics.

Mandy asks…
Published statistics on deaths from smoking-related illness can be misleading. For example?
In one country it was claimed that in 2001 one in four deaths were from smoking-related illness, This figure included all deaths from lung cancer, heart disease, strokes and bronchitis. All these diseases can be caused by smoking. It was not recorded whether all those who died from these diseases in 2001 had ever been smokers. Some of these diseases can have a variety of causes. Heart disease can also be caused by poor diet, lack of exercise or obesity. So it is possible that fewer than one in four of the deaths were from smoking-related illness.
Which two of the following definitions of ‘smoking-related illness’ express the meaning of the term as used in the conclusion of the above argument?
A. A fatal illness that has a variety of causes.
B. A disease from which all smokers suffer.
C. An illness that could have been caused only by smoking.
D A disease that has a number of possible causes, including smoking.
E. An illness that would not have occurred if the victim had not smoked.

admin answers:
The correct answer is C + E
Justification
The conclusion is based on the facts that the figure quoted in statistics included deaths from at least
one disease (heart disease) which can have other causes besides smoking; and that it had not been
recorded whether all those who died from diseases that can be caused by smoking had ever been
smokers. These facts support a conclusion that some of those who were said to have died from
‘smoking-related illness’ may have died from an illness caused by something other than smoking. By
claiming in the conclusion that some of those who were said to have died from ‘smoking-related
illness’ may not have died from smoking-related illness, the author must be interpreting the term as
meaning an illness that the individual would not have had if he or she had not been a smoker. Both C
and E capture this meaning.
Distractors
A is not the correct answer, because the conclusion implies that an illness can be ‘smoking-related’
only if it is caused by smoking. Moreover, it is not crucial to the author’s meaning of ‘smoking-related
illness’ that all such illness must be fatal.
B is not the correct answer, since the conclusion only requires the assumption that one must have
smoked in order to suffer a particular illness. It does not follow from this that all those who smoke
suffer from a particular disease.
D is not the correct answer, because this is the definition of ‘smoking-related illness’ upon which the
statistics that the author is disputing are based.

Lisa asks…
Regarding health care, does this not make sense to you?
By Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa)
Washington, DC — With the Senate health committee convening daily to craft a comprehensive health reform bill, the basic outline of this landmark legislation is now clear.
Yes, it will ensure access to affordable, quality care for every American. But, just as important, it will hold down health care costs by creating a sharp new emphasis on disease prevention and public health.
As the lead Senator in drafting the Prevention and Public Health section of the bill, I view this legislation as our opportunity to recreate America as a genuine wellness society – a society that is focused on prevention, good nutrition, fitness, and public health.
The fact is, we currently do not have a health care system in the United States; we have a sick care system. If you’re sick, you get care, whether through insurance, Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP, community health centers, emergency rooms, or charity. The problem is that this is all about patching things up after people develop serious illnesses and chronic conditions.
We spend a staggering $2.3 trillion annually on health care – 16.5 percent of our GDP and far more than any other country spends on health care – yet the World Health Organization ranks U.S. health care only 37th among nations, on par with Serbia.
We spend twice as much per capita on health care as European countries, but we are twice as sick with chronic disease.
How can this be so? The problem is that we have systematically neglected wellness and disease prevention. Currently in the United States, 95 percent of every health care dollar is spent on treating illnesses and conditions after they occur. But we spend peanuts on prevention.
The good news in these dismal statistics is that, by reforming our system and focusing on fighting and preventing chronic disease, we have a huge opportunity. We can not only save hundreds of billions of dollars; we can also dramatically improve the health of the American people.
Consider this: Right now, some 75 percent of health care costs are accounted for by heart disease, diabetes, prostate cancer, breast cancer, and obesity. What these five diseases and conditions have in common is that they are largely preventable and even reversible by changes in nutrition, physical activity, and lifestyle.
MEGAN – No honey, I definately don’t work for any medically related company.
I’m one of the folks they’ve forgotten about since I don’t have insurance anymore.

admin answers:
Yes it makes sense. CEO bonuses in the for profit health insurance industry alone could pay for immunizations for all children preventing a huge cost is hospitalizations. Early detection of high blood pressure reducing the need for kidney transplant. But, cleaning up the environment, air. Water, and chemicals could really reduce the cost of medical care. The healthcare mess is a direct result of what business has been allowed to do in the name of profit.

Thomas asks…
Why does Japan have such a high suicide rate? one of the worlds highest?
I am fasicnated by Japan, when looking up some statistics i found that they are one of the wealthiest countries, one of the most well educated countries, and have very low crime rates and low obesity rates. while looking through the statistics there was one for suicide. I was curious so clicked on it, and apart from third world countries Japan was almost at the top of the list very close to Russia.
I was quite surprised, after all I learned about japan such as there traditions, love of children and family, good education, very technology savvy, fashionable, and fairly wealthy etc.
It seems the most popular form of suicide is using a lethal, painless gas, many people leave notes in the windows of cars and drive somewhere quiet and secluded like the mountains, and gas out the car. In fact there is so much suicide that people do it in big groups But why? I know since the 90s (when the rise in suicide started) recession problems began to take effect. But the whole world has problems. America has poverty. In England there are individuals who are social outcast. France has homeless people. These kind of problems seem to be common in every affluent country. So why does Japan have one of the worlds highest suicide rates?

admin answers:
The suicide rate is so high because the economy collapsed and caused a depression. Millions of sole providers found themselves jobless in a society where traditionally only men were employed. This had a far greater impact on a person in Japan, than someone living in the west, because of a cultural tradition that offered a secure, personal connection to the place of employment. A job was a job for life and a boss was someone who made a tacit deal with an employee to protect the family for life. When this arrangement broke down – so did the trust in the future for the working Japanese family man. The fact that so many resorted to such an extreme solution can again be explained by the Japanese people’s view of responsibility, honor and death. This tragedy cannot be seen through western eyes where the work relationship between employer and employee is very different and work and life itself is valued very differently.
The Japanese people have changed their lifestyle very little in at least one respect – we can learn a lot from that. Unlike people in the West, the Japanese have stuck to their traditional diet. Obesity and obesity statistics are not on a priority list in Japan and neither is dieting.
The Carbohydrate Addicts Manual
To learn more about obesity statistics just click here:
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
The Carbohydrate Addicts Manual
Related Blogs
- Spic and span for spring – My Ideal Home Design
- Answer to the Friday Puzzle! « Richard Wiseman’s Blog
- Nancy Lancaster: English Country House Style | RDuJour
- Libya c/w Iraq? “I don’t care. Obama is awesome” (video) « Tony Blair
- 71 year old male CC: Chest pain – Conclusion – Prehospital 12-Lead ECG
- Another day another class « sorl aino django dev
- Kenneth J. Doka, M.Div., Ph.D.: Helping Children Spiritually Cope …
- Three Tips to Quit Smoking For Good | worldmusiclebanon.org
- Health care reform: Understanding the details of the ‘individual …
- Small Business WordPress Themes | Verify Answer
- Jerry Brown’s Health Care Cuts to Hurt Old, Sick, Poor …
- Div layer keep it in the heart of your tv screen.? | Aptop …
- this past Friday with sub|div.sound.system… | sub?division
- On dark day in Barahona case, care providers would gain legal …
- Cat Care Versus Dog Care
- Bipolar Disorder Mental Health Booklet | PDF King
- Critical Illness Insurance 03 – Understand the Definitions of …


















